Thursday, 28 July 2011

Torchwood: Miracle Day: Dead of Night

So this night's Torchwood was called "Dead of Night" ... which is traditionally the time that very little happens and in that regard this episode did not disappoint. It's not that there is anything intrinsically wrong with the storyline per se, it's just that it is interminably slow.

By Day Three of Children of Earth we were more than halfway through that saga, during which we'd had plenty of fun and action along the way, not least the destruction of Torchwood's "home", the arrival of the protagonist, plus Jack's bum(!) Episode three of Miracle Day is just over a quarter of the way through this story, and though there have been some 'exciting' bits, much of what we've seen on screen so far could easily have been condensed into a tighter narrative for one or perhaps an additional half episode, but not 160 minutes worth!

One of the issues I've always had with RTD's style in episodes of Doctor Who is that it often felt like a number of great scenes that were then patchworked together with faff to simply get from one to the other. The New World suffered from that, almost a "how do we move from this set piece to the next". This was followed by the nadir of Rendition taking a whole episode to move the characters from point A (Wales) to point B (Washington) - it could have been covered in one scene! With Dead of Night it's more of that patchwork strategy - again, some lovely character scenes but with some horrendous padding linking them together.

So the better bits in my view? The banter between the new Torchwood crew was nice, though at points it did seem to be a bit like "now US audience, this is what the Brits call our things". Jack's chat to Gwen on the phone was poignant, especially as we the viewers know that Gwen's attention is firmly on her real family, not his 'version' of one (nice reference to Ianto too). The return of the contact lenses was a good touch, too. But to be honest I'm hard-pressed to name another stand-out point at this stage! Oh, the Soulless were quite disturbing, those masks are creepy ... but I did wonder whether they'd actually play a more important role or if they're just another bit of "story dressing" to fill up some gaps.

I still find my interest in the show is only being drawn along by Jack and Gwen; I have little interest in the other characters in their own scenes, particularly. At this stage Esther is still the one I enjoy the most of the "newbies", whilst Rex continues to annoy me. Oswald is getting better - Bill Pullman seemed to lose the drawl in this episode which made the character immediately more engrossing. But Jilly - good grief. I'm neutral on Vera, we'll see how she progresses.



So ... the "controversy" of sexual cuts ... well unless there was a nuance to the Jack/Brad Rex/Vera scene that was totally lost on me I can't see how the cut/edit made any difference at all. Jack chatting up a bloke. Check. Jack having it off with a bloke. Check. Jack in bed with a bloke. Check. This actually smacks more of the "sexationalism" tactics that the cable channels in America often employ to gain viewers (Starz's Camelot and Spartacus, HBO's Game of Thrones and True Blood all have done this), and isn't helped by the 'soft-porn' soundtrack added by Murray Gold to accompany it! The BBC cut the 'rumpy-pumpy' out, but as they said it didn't impact the plot at all (I can't see why it was cut at all to be honest, there's been plenty of that post-watershed before!).

Personally I thought the real point was how Jack was dealing with relationships, and the phone conversation with Gwen afterwards was what it was really about, how he feels about his team after what happened two years before.

Speaking of Gold's music, that is one thing that is really beginning to niggle me. It sounds more like muzak in places, a bland "sound-by-numbers" to accompany those bits of screen time that are filling out themselves. It certainly isn't Torchwood - the three radio plays broadcast beforehand immediately "felt" like Torchwood - these television episodes just don't. I imagine he is composing the way the producers want, but then those producers have got that wrong. There is none of the passion or grandeur of his Doctor Who or Casanova work, and certainly none of the mood of the first three series of Torchwood. This is probably the most contributing factor of how the series can feel "Americanised" than anything else, as the Britishness is just being subverted. When he gets the chance, Gold is injecting some energy into it (like the beach chase in The New World), but (at the moment) sadly these have been scarce.

I hope it picks up next week (I know I thought that last week), and I know I'll watch next week, too, but it's definitely the "this is Torchwood" habit reasoning and not the "I have to see the next episode" drive that Children of Earth had. Still, seven episodes to redeem itself - like I said we're only a quarter of the way there and the latter part could radically change my outlook on the show.

Please be up to it!

Thursday, 21 July 2011

Torchwood: Miracle Day: Rendition

It wasn't that it was bad per se, but nothing really happened in the episode, and the first half was very very slow. Also didn't help that the best bits had already been broadcast beforehand with the BBC trailers and preview.

The question is: am I watching this because it is Torchwood? Otherwise would I have given up on this by now had it not had that connection?


The problem a television programme has to overcome is how to distinguish itself from all the other programmes around. For example looking at current series running on UK now, "Falling Skies" I found myself categorising as a "Children of Earth/Battlestar Galactica" hash, and "Body of Proof" as a "House/Bones" hash. I gave up on Camelot as being too bland, and Game of Thrones didn't really grab me either. Ie. these shows feel like generic "American" plot-by-numbers mashups.

Torchwood at the moment isn't distinguishing itself from the rest. After all, we've had The Event, Flash Forward, etc. recently, and if you're a newcomer to the show what makes Miracle Day any different? I know that, if it wasn't Jack and Gwen I wouldn't see much difference, and the "people live forever" plot isn't that engaging at present. It's only two out of ten episodes so far - but then it took Outcasts four episodes to start getting somewhere and that was too late for much of the audience.

Children of Earth was tightly plotted, witty, and when you hit the latter half of episode four utterly compelling and convincing. That's a lot to live up to, and so far Miracle Day hasn't provided the same quality blend of humour and drama. Also, if you can't empathise with a character then you just feel indifference towards them: Frobisher was compelling in CoE, Rex just isn't cutting it with me as yet. Esther is the better of the bunch this week for sure, but Lyn was just 'plastic'. And I expected a lot more from Bill Pullman's Danes, but the accent is just jarring and not always understandable.

(Unfortunately if you don't have Samuel L Jackson or Leslie Neilson on a plane for that length of time it doesn't really work! Orange wires notwithstanding)


Hopefully episode three will pick up now they're on the ground again, though of course the "cuts" are already causing controversy!

I'll watch next week, but at the moment that's purely because of wanting to see what happens to Jack and Gwen next - not bothered about anybody else at the moment, sadly :(

Sunday, 29 May 2011

Shh! Spoilers!

Spoilers seem to be such a hot topic for this series of Doctor Who, more so than in any other year. Here's my little review/take on the "fun" of the last several weeks - no spoilers included themselves :)


It all started when DWM published four covers for issue Issue 433 that all indicated the tag that one of those on the cover would die in the first episode! The argument put forward was that this built on anticipation rather than a real spoiler, but many fans thought it gave away an important plot point in an unmissable way, splashed across the cover as it was. Maybe so, but this was nothing to the BBC website who then proceeded to print a image of the Doctor apparently regenerating in the opening episode the morning of broadcast!!!



Meanwhile, the Radio Times - not one for keeping back on reveals as those who remember Daleks in Manhattan can testify! - presented a preview of the series coming up, and for A Good Man Goes To War printed a previously unseen photo that blatantly gave away a protagonist for the mid-series finale! Those of us that follow filming knew about this already, but for the general public/fandom it was the first time they had been seen!

So, with the first episode barely out, those fans who don't hunt down spoilers and were content to wait for the series had three reveals in a matter of weeks - none of which had been indicated in the trailer that had been broadcast for what seemed like months beforehand! But then again ... the CBBC version of the trailer revealed another returning character unseen in the main BBC ones!


Week two saw the plot of Day of the Moon revealed online, basically ruining any surprise for those who read it. Though the item was taken down, the damage had been done in some quarters, and prompted Steven Moffat to comment on such fans who give away details as "spoiler vandals" a couple of weeks later. With either a case of mockery or just simple irony, the Times then proceeded to do the same for The Doctor's Wife that weekend! (The Sun was previously chastised for such behaviour when they published the plot for The Stolen Earth back in 2008, though at least they didn't know the reallly big ending thank goodness!)

And now we reach the mid-series finale and a real controversy to spoiler purists. Information on the episode was put up on the BBC website before The Almost People had even been broadcast, giving away an additional two protagonists to the one the Radio Times had revealed a few weeks previously. The hubbub from this caused Moffat to retort: "To the worriers - anything on the BBC website is APPROVED, and not a real spoiler. You know NOTHING, trust me. No, actually, you can't." - which of course for some directly contradicts the 'vandal' comments before on spoiler policy!

This is where things can get heated. It makes sense to say that a spoiler is only a spoiler to those who don't know or don't wish to know something, but where do you draw the line between publicity for a storyline and giving too much away? For me perhaps knowing that there would be another Doctor at the end of The Rebel Flesh would have been a spoiler, but it wouldn't have been half as bad as knowing what happened at the end of The Almost People!

Harking back to Daleks in Manhattan, Doctor Who News fortunately tipped me off to the front cover of the Radio Times and didn't reveal it, and I actually managed to get to the episode without knowing about Dalek Sec's transformation. I'm still entirely sure how I managed that (grin). But this, to me, was an outright spoiler, verging into 'ruiner' territory - and this was orchestrated by the BBC's premier listings magazine itself!!!

Anyway, back to A Good Man Goes To War, and in perhaps the most bizarre spoiler scenario to date we saw that The Almost People ended with a "To Be Continued" and no "Next Time" preview; that might not seem bizarre in itself being The Stolen Earth ended similarly, but this time the BBC website posted a Trailer for the episode that continues the action and includes characters integral to the conclusion of the previous story (whereas for Journey's End it was a recap trailer and so not giving anything away)!

Personally I think this is all just getting a little bit too ridiculous - the various BBC departments could at least be more consistent in how they handle this! If there isn't a "Next Time" then it seems to to me that the production team's intention is that we shouldn't know what's next and wait in anticipation, so for the BBC site to then go and put a trailer revealing more anyway just seems like giving away details for its own sake rather than for any real publicity benefit.

(but then Moffat has said that all material on the website has been approved, so maybe we should simply blame him for all the shenanigans? (grin))


There's still a week to go, with the BBC site promising more previews, a Radio Times that will probably have a front cover revelation, not to mention the trailer on television and publicity stills with more images ... would we have any chance of avoiding finding out things we really wouldn't want to know beforehand?!!! And all this is just for the mid-series finale - there's six more episodes to be revealed later this year!

Spoilers? Shh!!!!!!

Friday, 8 April 2011

Well that wraps it up!

Been a while since I posted, so here's another in the ongoing TARDIS collection :)


By hedoknitstic on Flickr

Not quite needed for the weather here in the UK this week, but probably next week LOL!

Saturday, 5 March 2011

In Memory

Funerals are weird occasions. On the one hand you are gathering due to the death of an individual, on the other it also serves to bring together colleagues, friends and families to remember someone they knew, admired, and loved.

Thus today, Saturday 5th March, we gathered to say goodbye to William Nicholas Stone Courtney - Nick, aka the Brig - who had passed away a couple of weeks before on the 22nd February. The service was to take place at the Golder's Green West Chapel at 1:00pm

We arrived around 12:30pm, and as the hour approached many more of his friends and colleagues were to arrive to pay their respects. This would, of course, include those we know from Doctor Who, and amongst us 'civvies' were Sylvester McCoy and Colin Baker, Frazer Hines and Wendy Padbury, Richard Franklin, and others that Nick knew well like Frank Williams and Pamela Cundell, from Dad's Army. Other people here to pay respects included Big Finish producer Nick Briggs, his predecessor and new series script editor Gary Russell, plus other names long associated with appreciation of the show like Jeremy Bentham, Ian Levine and Toby Hadoke.

First hymn was Praise My Soul The King Of Heaven - one that has the remarkably apt line in the last verse for Doctor Who fans: "Dwellers all in time and space"! This was followed by a reading of John 1:14 by his close friend and autobiography co-writer Michael McManus.

Memories of Nick were then shared. Firstly, his son Philip recounted childhood tales of his father, and growing up with the 'Brigadier'. Unlike some actors, Nick always used to watch his work with a critical eye on performance! Then, his neighbour Carmelo Xuereb talked about how he met Nick that first weekend in Crouch End - amidst a broken down car and champagne! - and their growing friendship, leading up to shared family holidays together in Malta. Finally, the Reverend Bert Baker, who was leading the ceremony, spoke fondly of his parishioner and friend's passion for the King James Bible!

The next hymn to be sung was Jerusalem, which was then followed by a reading of Desiderata (Max Ehrmann) by Sally Mates. Afterwards, Lindsay Richardson sang a haunting rendition of the poem Fear no more the heat o' the sun by Shakespeare (Cymberline Act IV). Then, another Shakespeare script, this time from Hamlet (Act 1), "Polonius's advice to his son Laertes", read by honorary grand-children Luke and Christopher Xuereb.

After a reflection by Bert Baker - including how Nick had once portrayed God with great conviction! - the service concluded with his favourite hymn, To Be A Pilgrim. Then, it was time to pay final respects to a man who had brought so much enjoyment to life and depart the chapel to the tones of La Mer ...

It was one of those wierd coincidences that, on a dull and blustery day outside, as the ceremony continued rays of sunshine started to filter into the chapel, seemingly bathing the coffin in haloes of light as they gleamed off its brass - it's time like that when you can almost feel somebody is smiling down on proceedings. Certainly as, once the service was over and we left the chapel, there was no sign of the sun above the bleak chilly clouds that had cast their way across the sky once more!

It was a day of sadness, of remembrance, but also a celebration of Nick's life. The memories shared by others also enabled us to recall our own times with Nick, and as Philip had said, his ability to laugh at himself and always see the best in those he knew. For me, it was a
privilege to have been able to know this genial gentleman personally, the man who brought the indomitable Brigadier to life!

A cheery five rounds to you, Sir Alistair!


You can read my obituary for Nick at Doctor Who News, and more personal photos and memories on Facebook.

Tribute videos to Nicholas Courtney

A video obituary by Ed Stradling for Nicholas Courtney:

 

 
If you haven't had a chance to watch it yet, this is a beautiful tribute video by Babelcolour.

Friday, 4 February 2011