Thursday 28 July 2011

Torchwood: Miracle Day: Dead of Night

So this night's Torchwood was called "Dead of Night" ... which is traditionally the time that very little happens and in that regard this episode did not disappoint. It's not that there is anything intrinsically wrong with the storyline per se, it's just that it is interminably slow.

By Day Three of Children of Earth we were more than halfway through that saga, during which we'd had plenty of fun and action along the way, not least the destruction of Torchwood's "home", the arrival of the protagonist, plus Jack's bum(!) Episode three of Miracle Day is just over a quarter of the way through this story, and though there have been some 'exciting' bits, much of what we've seen on screen so far could easily have been condensed into a tighter narrative for one or perhaps an additional half episode, but not 160 minutes worth!

One of the issues I've always had with RTD's style in episodes of Doctor Who is that it often felt like a number of great scenes that were then patchworked together with faff to simply get from one to the other. The New World suffered from that, almost a "how do we move from this set piece to the next". This was followed by the nadir of Rendition taking a whole episode to move the characters from point A (Wales) to point B (Washington) - it could have been covered in one scene! With Dead of Night it's more of that patchwork strategy - again, some lovely character scenes but with some horrendous padding linking them together.

So the better bits in my view? The banter between the new Torchwood crew was nice, though at points it did seem to be a bit like "now US audience, this is what the Brits call our things". Jack's chat to Gwen on the phone was poignant, especially as we the viewers know that Gwen's attention is firmly on her real family, not his 'version' of one (nice reference to Ianto too). The return of the contact lenses was a good touch, too. But to be honest I'm hard-pressed to name another stand-out point at this stage! Oh, the Soulless were quite disturbing, those masks are creepy ... but I did wonder whether they'd actually play a more important role or if they're just another bit of "story dressing" to fill up some gaps.

I still find my interest in the show is only being drawn along by Jack and Gwen; I have little interest in the other characters in their own scenes, particularly. At this stage Esther is still the one I enjoy the most of the "newbies", whilst Rex continues to annoy me. Oswald is getting better - Bill Pullman seemed to lose the drawl in this episode which made the character immediately more engrossing. But Jilly - good grief. I'm neutral on Vera, we'll see how she progresses.



So ... the "controversy" of sexual cuts ... well unless there was a nuance to the Jack/Brad Rex/Vera scene that was totally lost on me I can't see how the cut/edit made any difference at all. Jack chatting up a bloke. Check. Jack having it off with a bloke. Check. Jack in bed with a bloke. Check. This actually smacks more of the "sexationalism" tactics that the cable channels in America often employ to gain viewers (Starz's Camelot and Spartacus, HBO's Game of Thrones and True Blood all have done this), and isn't helped by the 'soft-porn' soundtrack added by Murray Gold to accompany it! The BBC cut the 'rumpy-pumpy' out, but as they said it didn't impact the plot at all (I can't see why it was cut at all to be honest, there's been plenty of that post-watershed before!).

Personally I thought the real point was how Jack was dealing with relationships, and the phone conversation with Gwen afterwards was what it was really about, how he feels about his team after what happened two years before.

Speaking of Gold's music, that is one thing that is really beginning to niggle me. It sounds more like muzak in places, a bland "sound-by-numbers" to accompany those bits of screen time that are filling out themselves. It certainly isn't Torchwood - the three radio plays broadcast beforehand immediately "felt" like Torchwood - these television episodes just don't. I imagine he is composing the way the producers want, but then those producers have got that wrong. There is none of the passion or grandeur of his Doctor Who or Casanova work, and certainly none of the mood of the first three series of Torchwood. This is probably the most contributing factor of how the series can feel "Americanised" than anything else, as the Britishness is just being subverted. When he gets the chance, Gold is injecting some energy into it (like the beach chase in The New World), but (at the moment) sadly these have been scarce.

I hope it picks up next week (I know I thought that last week), and I know I'll watch next week, too, but it's definitely the "this is Torchwood" habit reasoning and not the "I have to see the next episode" drive that Children of Earth had. Still, seven episodes to redeem itself - like I said we're only a quarter of the way there and the latter part could radically change my outlook on the show.

Please be up to it!

Thursday 21 July 2011

Torchwood: Miracle Day: Rendition

It wasn't that it was bad per se, but nothing really happened in the episode, and the first half was very very slow. Also didn't help that the best bits had already been broadcast beforehand with the BBC trailers and preview.

The question is: am I watching this because it is Torchwood? Otherwise would I have given up on this by now had it not had that connection?


The problem a television programme has to overcome is how to distinguish itself from all the other programmes around. For example looking at current series running on UK now, "Falling Skies" I found myself categorising as a "Children of Earth/Battlestar Galactica" hash, and "Body of Proof" as a "House/Bones" hash. I gave up on Camelot as being too bland, and Game of Thrones didn't really grab me either. Ie. these shows feel like generic "American" plot-by-numbers mashups.

Torchwood at the moment isn't distinguishing itself from the rest. After all, we've had The Event, Flash Forward, etc. recently, and if you're a newcomer to the show what makes Miracle Day any different? I know that, if it wasn't Jack and Gwen I wouldn't see much difference, and the "people live forever" plot isn't that engaging at present. It's only two out of ten episodes so far - but then it took Outcasts four episodes to start getting somewhere and that was too late for much of the audience.

Children of Earth was tightly plotted, witty, and when you hit the latter half of episode four utterly compelling and convincing. That's a lot to live up to, and so far Miracle Day hasn't provided the same quality blend of humour and drama. Also, if you can't empathise with a character then you just feel indifference towards them: Frobisher was compelling in CoE, Rex just isn't cutting it with me as yet. Esther is the better of the bunch this week for sure, but Lyn was just 'plastic'. And I expected a lot more from Bill Pullman's Danes, but the accent is just jarring and not always understandable.

(Unfortunately if you don't have Samuel L Jackson or Leslie Neilson on a plane for that length of time it doesn't really work! Orange wires notwithstanding)


Hopefully episode three will pick up now they're on the ground again, though of course the "cuts" are already causing controversy!

I'll watch next week, but at the moment that's purely because of wanting to see what happens to Jack and Gwen next - not bothered about anybody else at the moment, sadly :(